|, July 30, 2004 Arthur frees one of them, Guinevere (Keira Knightley), who in turn brokers a truce between Arthur and the Britons so as to ward off an invading Saxon army. Read critic reviews. Audiences have received the movie relatively well, earning it a B+ CinemaScore, but the same cannot be said for critics, who sliced and diced the picture down to a 27% on Rotten Tomatoes. Sign up here. King Arthur: Legend of the Sword Synopsis. I don't believe in heaven. 2.5/5 - Fair. But once he pulls the sword from the stone, he is forced to acknowledge his true legacy - whether he likes it or not. Please reference “Error Code 2121” when contacting customer service. The final product is an underwhelming one, and yet, it doesn't quite plummet as deeply into underwhelmingness as they say, going saves as, at the very least, entertaining, with more than a few saving graces and lively strengths, including a predictable one: worthy score work. Please click the link below to receive your verification email. Ehh. Arthur isn’t actually the king for most of the movie, and to become one takes a great deal of swashbuckling heroism and sacrifice … King Arthur: Legend of the Sword spoils itself in its very own title. Cinemark The critical reception section of this article cites Rotten Tomatoes, a reliable source, to show that 31% of professional film critics gave King Arthur: Legend of the Sword a positive review, which objectively means that this film's critical reception was "generally negative". Copyright © Fandango. Verified reviews are considered more trustworthy by fellow moviegoers. In this interpretation of the classic tale, Arthur (Clive Owen) is a cavalry officer in the Roman army defending Hadrian's Wall against rebellious Britons. King Arthur: Legend of the Sword Synopsis. (always said in capital letters w/an exclamation in this film) rose from the ashes of nations to become A LAND OF FREE MEN! It also … Forgot your password? |, September 7, 2017 So yeah, as you can tell, historical accuracy isn't the only thing about this film that's debatable, with one of the most debatable things pertaining to this production being, well, my actually finding it to be decent. Nevertheless, audiences seemed to like it more than critics. It’s easy to blame King Arthur: Legend of the Sword‘s bombing on Warner Bros.’ overindulgence in classic IPs for the screen, and goodness knows, they … By creating an account, you agree to the Privacy Policy |, July 29, 2004 We are all going to die someday. But once he pulls the sword from the stone, he is forced to acknowledge his true legacy - whether he likes it or not. Bottom line, Antoine Fuqua's overambitiously heavy-handed storytelling is sloppy, though not as much as David Franzoni's which goes tainted by cheesiness and built upon a plot foundation that is shallow and, worst of all, exceedingly generic and predictable, with a distancingly superficiality and sloppiness that drive this promising project into underwhelmingness, though not quite into total mediocrty, going supported by Hans Zimmer's somewhat formulaic yet, as usual, excellent score work, as well as by excellent product designs, handsome cinematography and many a thrilling action set piece, all of which go into livening up an undeniably rather interesting story concept, which goes executed within enough charm by Antoine Fuqua, complimented by a mostly charismatic cast, to make "King Arthur" an entertaining marriage of history and legend, even if it could have been more. This is one king that's best left alone. With Charlie Hunnam, Astrid Bergès-Frisbey, Jude Law, Djimon Hounsou. Regal Robbed of his birthright, Arthur comes up the hard way in the back alleys of the city. KING ARTHUR: Legend of the Sword has received terrible early reviews with Guy Ritchie's directing and David Beckham's cameo contributing to brutally low score Rotten Tomatoes. Now, regardless of how I make it sound, this film isn't quite as technically and stylistically sharp as certain other blockbusters of its type, but it is a well-produced blockbuster, nevertheless, which puts its $120 million to good use when it comes to technicality, even though it stands to put more effort into substance. Coming Soon, Regal Robbed of his birthright, Arthur comes up the hard way in the back alleys of the city. The rotten tomatoes are pure rubbish on this one. Coming Soon. | Rating: 1.0/4.0 The king tortures a man before killing him. The king's guard kills citizens who are protesting, even children. The film had a long gestation period, and ended up costing $175 million to make. Directed by Guy Ritchie. Directed by Guy Ritchie, Legend of the Sword was supposed to kick off an entire franchise of movies built around the King Arthur legend. "King Arthur: Legend of the Sword" will flop. Really, if nothing else, this film is simply entertaining, deserving to have more substance, but still having enough style, livliness and charm to provide an adequate degree of fun that gets you by, even if you do end up wishing that this film had more to it. King Arthur: Legend of the Sword currently holds a score of 31% on Rotten Tomatoes, with reviewers criticizing its over-reliance on CGI, the tiresome nature of the quick-cut, non-linear editing, Charlie Hunnam's lacking qualities as a leading man, and the film's story for being simultaneously over-packed and shallow. Don't have an account? I’m not claiming to be an expert on the legend of King Arthur, and to be honest there are so many different versions of the story out there that it is actually difficult to know what the official version actually is. We won’t be able to verify your ticket today, but it’s great to know for the future. Coming Soon. (They let some women come along with 'em, too.) In fact, critics on Rotten Tomatoes even agree that the movie suffers from terrible miscasting. Scooby-Doo! Your AMC Ticket Confirmation# can be found in your order confirmation email. Sidney Poitier’s 7 Most Memorable Performances, All Harry Potter Movies Ranked Worst to Best by Tomatometer, Awards Leaderboard: Top Movies of 2020 – Rotten Tomatoes. This intrigue goes intensified by charm within Antoine Fuqua's direction and, of course, the cast, which has nothing to do and, of course, Keira Knightley, who isn't necessarily bad or mediocre, but kind of bland, much like certain areas of her attractiveness (She's cut and all, but come on, people), whereas most everyone else in the cast works about as much past material shortcomings as they can, delivering on charisma that is most intense within our portrayers of the legendary knights, all of whom share striking chemistry that adds to the film's reasonable degree of livliness. WatchMojoUK: Top 10 Good British Movies with a Bad Rotten Tomatoes Score (2019) (TV Episode) King Arthur: Legend of the Sword is #9. King Arthur: Legend of the Sword currently holds a score of 31% on Rotten Tomatoes, with reviewers criticizing its over-reliance on CGI, the tiresome nature of the quick-cut, non-linear editing, Charlie Hunnam's lacking qualities as a leading man, and the film's story for being simultaneously over-packed and shallow. then take me there. A powerful mage's forces destroy part of a castle and the guards defending it. Ritchie's filmmaking style was also called out for being woefully mismatched to a … and to receive email from Rotten Tomatoes and Fandango. Unfortunately, the film was a non-starter at the box office with only $148 million grossed worldwide on a reported budget of $175 million. The image is an example of a ticket confirmation email that AMC sent you when you purchased your ticket. The site's critical consensus reads, "King Arthur: Legend of the Sword piles mounds of modern action flash on an age-old tale – and wipes out much of what made it a classic story in the first place."